
Duo Report FNCS 2026 Major 2 · Grand Finals · NAC
Curve + Higgsǃ: fourth place, earned on foot
One Victory Royale, 44 eliminations, 525 points — and more ground covered than almost anyone in the event. The ELITE data desk parsed all 12 NAC Grand Finals replays to profile the duo that opened with the weekend's biggest game, then walked through the worst storm NAC had to offer.
The short version
KoS Curve and XSET Higgsǃ finished 4th in the NAC Grand Finals with 525 points — and no duo in either region worked harder for a placement. They opened with the single biggest game of the entire event (a 113-point Victory Royale with 12 eliminations in Game 1), then spent the rest of the weekend paying NAC's worst storm tax — 9,492.6 m, 5th-most of 99 duos — while covering more ground than almost anyone alive: Curve walked 67.05 km (#2 of all 200 players), Higgs 64.72 km (#4). The iron men of the Major, by replay-verified numbers.
4th
NAC Grand Finals finish
113
Points in Game 1
67.05 km
Curve's ground covered
64.72 km
Higgs's ground covered
791.1m
Storm tax per game
65.4%
Curve's workload share
Twelve games, one ledger
The shape of their weekend is right there in the strip: a monster open, a long grind, one hole, one late surge. Of their 525 points, 176 came from eliminations (33.5%) — the rest was placement, collected the hard way. In the final NAC table they sat 4th on 525, with third (GEN aj + XSET veno5x) at 561 and fifth (DТ Rise + XSET Muz 7ǃ) at 520.
| Game | Day | Placement | Elims | Points | Duo damage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1Win | Day 1 | 1st | 12 | 113 | 1,793 |
| G2 | Day 1 | #6 | 2 | 48 | 998 |
| G3 | Day 1 | #8 | 5 | 56 | 1,787 |
| G4 | Day 1 | #21 | 0 | 10 | 973 |
| G5 | Day 1 | #10 | 3 | 44 | 910 |
| G6 | Day 1 | #16 | 2 | 28 | 784 |
| G7 | Day 2 | #36 | 0 | 0 | 222 |
| G8 | Day 2 | #11 | 1 | 34 | 1,104 |
| G9 | Day 2 | #15 | 6 | 46 | 1,002 |
| G10 | Day 2 | #16 | 2 | 28 | 746 |
| G11 | Day 2 | #4 | 8 | 80 | 1,273 |
| G12 | Day 2 | #13 | 3 | 38 | 956 |
Inside the duo, the split was no mystery: Curve carried 65.4% of the workload (half damage share, half elim share). His 31 eliminations on Epic's kill counter ranked #4 of all 200 players and #2 in NAC, and his 7,771 damage ranked #10 in the field. Higgs added 14 elims and 4,777 damage — but his one big swing, 1,086 damage in Game 1, was the biggest single-game number either of them posted all weekend, and it came in the game that defined their event.
The signature: what only this duo did
1. The 113-point opener — the biggest game of the whole Major
Game 1, Day 1: a Victory Royale with 12 team eliminations for 113 points — the highest-scoring single game by any duo in either region across all 24 Grand Finals games. It was also the weekend's only 12-elim game that actually ended in a win: the other 12-bomb, by an AUR duo in EU Game 12, placed 23rd. Curve took 8 of the elims, Higgs 4 with that 1,086 damage. One game in, their event already had a spine the rest of the weekend could lean on — see the full winner ledger in the NAC deep dive.

2. The iron-men grind: #2 and #4 movers of all 200 players
Across 12 games, Curve covered 67.05 km — second of all 200 Grand Finals players, behind only reеtǃ at 69.52 — and Higgs covered 64.72 km, fourth. Both members of one duo inside the field's top four for ground covered; no stat says "iron men" louder. The survival clocks back it up: Curve spent 223.3 minutes alive (9th in the field), Higgs 218.6 (17th). The full 200-player grind table lives in the Grand Finals stats hub.

3. NAC's worst storm luck — by a distance
All that walking wasn't a lifestyle choice. Measuring storm tax — meters caught outside each freshly locked circle from phase 3 on — Curve and Higgs paid 9,492.6 m across the series, 791.1 m per game, against a field median of 378.4 m. That's the 5th-unluckiest of all 99 measured duos, and the four duos above them were all EU — making this the worst storm luck any NAC duo endured. More than double the median tax, every single game, and they still banked five top-10s. The circle-by-circle autopsy is in the zones & map analysis.

4. Alone at Lifty Lodge — with the commute to prove it
Their drop was a model of discipline: a spot near Lifty Lodge, 144 m from the POI marker, with an average landing spread of just 26.2 m — and not one other NAC duo's median landing within 250 m of it. Zero contest, all loot. The catch was the address: zone 5 came to Lifty Lodge exactly once all weekend — in EU Game 3, a lobby they weren't in — and never in NAC. NAC rotations from the POI averaged 1,026.7 m to zone 5 (vs 863.1 m in EU), and its single worst haul of the weekend was 1,848.9 m in NAC Game 10. Free real estate, expensive commute — the two halves of their iron-man weekend in one drop pick. Endgame addresses for every POI are in the zones & map analysis.

One more texture note from the kill-steal ledger: Curve had 3 of his knocks finished by other teams against 2 steals of his own — enough to make the weekend's most-robbed table — while Higgs was robbed twice and stole none. Even the third-party economy taxed this duo.
Fourth place, 67 kilometers.
Argue the all-grind team of the Major with 11,000+ Fortnite players.
The arc: Day 1 sprinted, Day 2 crawled
The replay profile calls them a spike duo, and the days split cleanly: 10.33 average placement on Day 1, 15.83 on Day 2. The best game needs no introduction — Game 1, 113 points, the event's biggest. The worst was its mirror: Game 7, the Day 2 opener — 36th place, zero eliminations, zero points, and just 222 duo damage, their quietest game of the weekend.
What keeps the arc from reading as a fade is Game 11: 4th place, 8 elims, 80 points — their second-best game of the series, late on Day 2, with Higgs out-fragging Curve 6 to 3 for the only time all weekend. A housekeeping note for anyone checking the official board: Higgs renamed his account mid-event, so his Day 2 games appear under a different display name. Same epicId — every number on this page follows the player, not the name.
How we measured this
Every stat here was parsed from Epic's public server-side tournament replays by the ELITE data desk — movement traces, zone telemetry, the kill feed, and a replay-derived damage model (net damage to players; structures and overkill excluded). Players are tracked by account id, because display names change mid-event — this duo is the proof. Per-game points were recomputed from the FNCS 2026 scoring table and match Epic's official leaderboard for all 50 NAC duos. Per-player eliminations come from Epic's replicated kill counter; the per-player sum (45) differs from the official duo total (44) by one official correction. Kill-feed ordering is reliable but carries no clock times, so we make no claims about when fights happened.
FAQ
How did KoS Curve and XSET Higgsǃ do at the FNCS 2026 Major 2 Grand Finals?
They finished 4th in the NAC region with 525 points from 12 games: one Victory Royale (Game 1, with 12 eliminations), 44 team eliminations, five top-10 finishes, and a 13.08 average placement. 176 of their 525 points (33.5%) came from eliminations. Series points were computed from replays and verified against Epic's official leaderboard.
What was the highest-scoring single game by any duo at the FNCS Major 2 Grand Finals?
Curve and Higgs's Game 1 in NAC: 113 points from a Victory Royale with 12 team eliminations — the highest-scoring game any duo posted in either region across all 24 Grand Finals games, and the only 12-elimination game of the weekend that ended in a win. The other 12-elim game, by an AUR duo in EU Game 12, placed 23rd.
Who walked the farthest at the FNCS Major 2 Grand Finals?
reеtǃ covered the most ground of all 200 Grand Finals players at 69.52 km across 12 games. KoS Curve was #2 at 67.05 km and XSET Higgsǃ was #4 at 64.72 km — both members of the same duo inside the field's top four. Part of the reason: their duo paid 9,492.6 m of storm tax, the 5th-most of 99 measured duos and the most of any NAC duo.
Join the ELITE ARENA Discord
11,000+ Fortnite players — stat drops, scrims, and every duo report the moment it lands.

